The Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment

by Jan Mitchell

Voters will accept or reject an amendment to the Minnesota state Constitution in November. The Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment would increase the state sales tax by 3/8 of a cent to generate dedicated funds for the next 25 years – 33% for clean water, 33% for restoration and protection of habitat, 20% for arts and culture, and 14% for parks and trails. This measure is expected to provide about $300 million per year, at an annual cost to the average household of about $60. The League of Women Voters supports this measure for several reasons:
•    state funding for these purposes is less than 1% of the budget – a 30 year low.
•    40% of tested rivers, lakes and streams are contaminated.
•    development threatens a million acres of natural lands.
•    reliable funding is essential for efficient long-term planning.
•    a broad constituency is served by this amendment, including future generations.

The Northfield/Cannon Falls League will host a forum to consider this measure on October 23rd – location TBA.

REMINDER – Minnesota law provides that any voter who leaves a blank on the amendment proposal is counted as voting AGAINST it.

2 Comments

  1. Posted October 7, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    So much money has been wasted on environmental issues. Not because the money isn’t going for a good cause. The money is wasted because of the way it is applied. Laws must include certain measures to prevent large losses. Pre testing on a smaller scale should be one of the mandatory steps, as should be thorough research and networking with other states and countries that have similar issues.

  2. kiffisumma
    Posted October 12, 2008 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    T he location for this meeting is still TBA… is there a location set, yet?

    It’s very important for people to not just have a “gut reaction” to this issue but to actually understand the “LIVING” nature of our MN constitution as opposed to some other states, the high bar for amendment, the dispersal of $$ if this amendment passes, and the opportunity for planning that it would afford to the legislative process.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*