<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Council Meeting &#8211; Mon., Dec. 1, 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/weblog/post/1578/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/weblog/post/1578/</link>
	<description>Serving the communities of Northfield and Cannon Falls, Minnesota, and surrounding areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kiffisumma</title>
		<link>http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/weblog/post/1578/comment-page-1/#comment-13369</link>
		<dc:creator>kiffisumma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/?p=1578#comment-13369</guid>
		<description>Jane;  Answers:  No, the list of liquor store sites was NOT distributed. But it has been on both Locally grown and in the newspaper.
No, there was no comment specifically  about the Gleason property, except for it being said that all the original seven proposals would go to the council, although the &#039;rating group&#039; only had access to five.
I think the council will see the seven RFPs at a special closed session ( 6pm ?) before the 12.8 work session.
I also believe it is the intention of the current council to take some action; (not sure whether the rating group actually developed a &#039;recommendation&#039;, that all very hush-hush) but can&#039;t predict what council&#039;s action will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane;  Answers:  No, the list of liquor store sites was NOT distributed. But it has been on both Locally grown and in the newspaper.<br />
No, there was no comment specifically  about the Gleason property, except for it being said that all the original seven proposals would go to the council, although the &#8216;rating group&#8217; only had access to five.<br />
I think the council will see the seven RFPs at a special closed session ( 6pm ?) before the 12.8 work session.<br />
I also believe it is the intention of the current council to take some action; (not sure whether the rating group actually developed a &#8216;recommendation&#8217;, that all very hush-hush) but can&#8217;t predict what council&#8217;s action will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane McWiliams</title>
		<link>http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/weblog/post/1578/comment-page-1/#comment-13232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane McWiliams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/?p=1578#comment-13232</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kiffi. Good idea to include consent items! Was the list of liquor store sites distributed? Any comments about V. Gleason&#039;s offer to sell her property for $1? Other comments? 
When will the recommendation come to the council? Will the current council act on the recommendation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kiffi. Good idea to include consent items! Was the list of liquor store sites distributed? Any comments about V. Gleason&#8217;s offer to sell her property for $1? Other comments?<br />
When will the recommendation come to the council? Will the current council act on the recommendation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
